USER NAME PASSWORD
AIP's 58 founding members collectively publish 1,5 million newspapers every week?
7 September 2010 | HOME | ADVANCED SEARCH | CONTACT US | LEGAL
publicresources
AIP membership directory
Who owns whom?
AIP Projects
Industry News
Training News
AIP Media Monitor
News from AIP Members
ABC Grassroots Certificate
AIP Summit 2007
memberresources
Advertising Strategies
Circulation & Distribution
Design & Layout Strategies
Editorial Innovations
Legal Resources
Management Tools
Market Research
Production Systems
syndicatenetwork
Advertising Sydicate
Bulk-Purchasing Syndicate
Editorial Syndicate
Production Syndicate

your email address

Industry News
Bringing you all the latest trends and developments
Newspapers no longer bound by 'sub judice' law
Saturday | Aug 11, 2007
The South African National Editors' Forum (SANEF) has welcomed the Supreme Court of Appeal judgement that effectively frees the media of the 'sub judice' prohibition on reporting about current court cases. 
 
The Appeals Court ruled in favour of e.tv over an attempt by the national director of public prosecutions (DPP) to prohibit the broadcast of a documentary programme on the baby Jordan murder until the DPP had given his approval.

The judgment by Justice Robert Nugent overturned a ruling by the Cape Provincial Division in favour of the DPP.
 
Justice Nugent said in his ruling that publication was susceptible to being declared unlawful and thus subject to prohibition only if the prejudice that the publication might cause to the administration of justice is demonstrable and substantial and there is a real risk that prejudice will actually occur.

The judge made the point that mere conjecture or speculation that prejudice might occur will not be enough.

In line with global trends

SANEF said in a statement that Judge Nugent's decision means that South African law has been brought into line with global trends and what may be expected in contemporary democracies, and effectively rules that the sub judice rule is outdated.

“This means that recourse to this legal excuse to avoid public discussion of an issue – a favourite ploy of politicians – is no longer valid and those using it can be called to account.”

The judge declared that the principle enunciated in the judgment would seem to apply whenever the exercise of press freedom is sought to be restricted in protection of another right.

This judgment means that the prohibitions on publication following urgent application to the courts -- such as occurred with the Danish cartoons in relation to two Sunday papers and in regard to a number of other stories in the Mail & Guardian and other papers -- would not have been possible.

SANEF, which has always maintained that those prohibitions offended against the media's constitutional rights to freedom and were eroding the practice of press freedom in the country, commends the SCA for stopping the slide into legal censorship and for upholding the freedom of the media.

printer-friendly version

HOME | Industry News


Latest News
Newspapers no longer bound by 'sub judice' law
'Work from home' scam ads outlawed
Grassroots press get two seats on Press Council
Small papers can be investigative giants - Prof Harber
Major new Sunday newspaper planned for Gauteng


What type of training works best for small newspapers
Short courses at a university/college
On-site training in my own newsroom
Online training over the Internet
A combination of the above

View Results
© Association of Independent Publishers, 2005